Member

Change your cover photo
Upload
Martin Hauser
Change your cover photo

Dr. iur. (Munich, M.C.J (NYU), M.A. Mediation (Viadrina)


International Commercial Mediator, mediating online


This user account status is Approved
User Rating
5.00 average based on 3 reviews.
5 Star 2 4 Star 0 3 Star 0 2 Star 0 1 Star 0 (You are viewing only 5 star reviews. View all reviews)
You are not logged in. Please login to review this user.
Peter Rau
Mediation at its best by Peter Rau, 7 Jul 2023 A mediation with Martin is an excellent experience because of his great knowledge and experience in mediation, his professionalism, his integrity and his communicative personality. He is always giving the perfect neutral advice to make the mediation successful. His presence during the mediation is always at the right level to secure the progress. The participants feel "save" and always well advised during the whole mediation process.
by Peter Rau, 29 Mar 2024
Adeline Guilhen
Update Feedback Digest 14 June 2023 by Adeline Guilhen, 14 Jun 2023 This Feedback Digest has been updated to include 24 Feedbacks from Parties and Counsel in commercial mainly international dispute and deal mediations since March 2021.
Martin Hauser has consistently been rated at Performance Level 5 by the Parties and their Counsel for whom he has acted as a mediator.
All the Parties and Counsel, who in their vast majority had prior meditation experiences, recommend him as a mediator. A mediation with Martin is called an “excellent experience” because of his “great professionalism”: “Frankly, Martin is excellent”. “His intervention is very satisfactory”, “this mediator was perfect”, “everything perfect”, he “has been very efficient in the whole process”, “he is genial”.
Martin’s “extreme availability”, his thorough preparation of the Parties and their Counsel in view of the mediation process, his flexibility to adjust the “process flow” to reflect the conversation and to manage the interactions between participants and his facilitation of the discussion is underlined, as well as him insisting on having all the decision-makers present during the mediation to avoid breaking the dynamics of a plenary mediation session due to limited powers of attorney of the Party representatives.
Regarding the mediation process as such, Martin is described by the Parties and their Counsel as creating a “serene and peaceful framework for discussion between the Parties”, particularly for “nonviolent communication” among them.
He is said to have been “viewed as trustworthy and qualified by all our team, which helped the team to make progress. We felt that he had similar trust from the other side, which reassured us that he would be communicating well with them in the separate sessions. He showed a curiosity and patience …”.
Martin's methodical organization of the mediation, asking appropriate questions, making the Parties talk and express themselves and helping them “to ask questions in order to clarify the true reasons of the dispute”, and his support on reformulation of the Parties’ views, clarification, and negotiation, is much appreciated. He is said to succeed in getting the Parties to change positions and thus advance towards a negotiated solution. He accompanies them until signing. Martin understands “rather complex or original situations very well” and explains the issues. He is said to find the right moment to work alone in confidence with the Parties and/or Counsel. He may also urge the Parties to speed up the mediation process and their exchanges.
Even in cases in which the mediation did not resolve the issue, the Parties and their Counsel state that “the road already traveled with Martin was not wasted time, on the contrary”, that “the Parties have made substantial progress, both sides having come a long way”, changing their positions. Counsel believe that on this basis, a solution could be found later. These mediations are without exception also considered being worthwhile.
In deal mediations, Parties comment that they have “learned a lot of things”, which was surprising to them given the intensity of the existing long-term relationship between them. They also emphasize having acquired good negotiation habits and non-violent communication.
Martin was designated by mediation institutions which, according to the Parties and their Counsel, are mostly considered charging the right amount for his mediations.
No reportable negative comments have arisen.
by Adeline Guilhen, 29 Mar 2024
Adeline Guilhen
Update Feedback Digest 14 June 2023 by Adeline Guilhen, 14 Jun 2023 This Feedback Digest has been updated to include 24 Feedbacks from Parties and Counsel in commercial mainly international dispute and deal mediations since March 2021.
Martin Hauser has consistently been rated at Performance Level 5 by the Parties and their Counsel for whom he has acted as a mediator.
All the Parties and Counsel, who in their vast majority had prior meditation experiences, recommend him as a mediator. A mediation with Martin is called an “excellent experience” because of his “great professionalism”: “Frankly, Martin is excellent”. “His intervention is very satisfactory”, “this mediator was perfect”, “everything perfect”, he “has been very efficient in the whole process”, “he is genial”.
Martin’s “extreme availability”, his thorough preparation of the Parties and their Counsel in view of the mediation process, his flexibility to adjust the “process flow” to reflect the conversation and to manage the interactions between participants and his facilitation of the discussion is underlined, as well as him insisting on having all the decision-makers present during the mediation to avoid breaking the dynamics of a plenary mediation session due to limited powers of attorney of the Party representatives.
Regarding the mediation process as such, Martin is described by the Parties and their Counsel as creating a “serene and peaceful framework for discussion between the Parties”, particularly for “nonviolent communication” among them.
He is said to have been “viewed as trustworthy and qualified by all our team, which helped the team to make progress. We felt that he had similar trust from the other side, which reassured us that he would be communicating well with them in the separate sessions. He showed a curiosity and patience …”.
Martin's methodical organization of the mediation, asking appropriate questions, making the Parties talk and express themselves and helping them “to ask questions in order to clarify the true reasons of the dispute”, and his support on reformulation of the Parties’ views, clarification, and negotiation, is much appreciated. He is said to succeed in getting the Parties to change positions and thus advance towards a negotiated solution. He accompanies them until signing. Martin understands “rather complex or original situations very well” and explains the issues. He is said to find the right moment to work alone in confidence with the Parties and/or Counsel. He may also urge the Parties to speed up the mediation process and their exchanges.
Even in cases in which the mediation did not resolve the issue, the Parties and their Counsel state that “the road already traveled with Martin was not wasted time, on the contrary”, that “the Parties have made substantial progress, both sides having come a long way”, changing their positions. Counsel believe that on this basis, a solution could be found later. These mediations are without exception also considered being worthwhile.
In deal mediations, Parties comment that they have “learned a lot of things”, which was surprising to them given the intensity of the existing long-term relationship between them. They also emphasize having acquired good negotiation habits and non-violent communication.
Martin was designated by mediation institutions which, according to the Parties and their Counsel, are mostly considered charging the right amount for his mediations.
No reportable negative comments have arisen.
by Adeline Guilhen, 29 Mar 2024
Shopping Basket
Scroll to Top