Blog Comments
Blog Comments
User Rating
You are not logged in. Please login to review this user.
A Really professional mediator
This Feedback Digest has been updated to include over 60 Feedbacks since the end of 2020.
The mediations have been done between the end of 2020 and the end of 2024.
The feedbacks come mostly from the lawyers and from the parties .The mediations were addressed by the Court, which implies always that some parties are here “because the judge firmly proposed the mediation” . Thus, the mediation process is always with lawyers and parties are more or less in a desire to mediate.
In other mediations, M Amar was chosen because his reputation is good and lawyers like to adress their clients.
M Amar is mostly rated at a 5 level , and a very few 4 level, only one 3 and only because of the rates fixed by the Court.
On the question “would you recommend M Amar”, all the answers were yes.
The quality most quoted in the feedbacks is pragmatism, efficiency.
He is implied, he listen. He is very professional. He is a good negociator and demonstrates a certain authority.
He is very available, serious ans involved.
He is calm, he has a quick undertanding of the situations, listen to both parts, and act swiftly towards solutions.
He is described as a fine psychologist, with authority and dynamism.
The profile of M Amar as a mediator seems to be a one daring to suggest solutions if needed, even go as far as to make recommendations .
Because in some matters he is also skilled in the field of the mediation, he can lead the parties to reach a solution, helping them not only on the process but also on the object of the dispute.
The parties would recommend him whatever the result of the mediation. We can see that his special touch is also a kind of teaching mediation in the way that the persons understand the usefullness of the process and enjoy it.
Once again, no reportable negative comments have arisen.
The mediations have been done between the end of 2020 and the end of 2024.
The feedbacks come mostly from the lawyers and from the parties .The mediations were addressed by the Court, which implies always that some parties are here “because the judge firmly proposed the mediation” . Thus, the mediation process is always with lawyers and parties are more or less in a desire to mediate.
In other mediations, M Amar was chosen because his reputation is good and lawyers like to adress their clients.
M Amar is mostly rated at a 5 level , and a very few 4 level, only one 3 and only because of the rates fixed by the Court.
On the question “would you recommend M Amar”, all the answers were yes.
The quality most quoted in the feedbacks is pragmatism, efficiency.
He is implied, he listen. He is very professional. He is a good negociator and demonstrates a certain authority.
He is very available, serious ans involved.
He is calm, he has a quick undertanding of the situations, listen to both parts, and act swiftly towards solutions.
He is described as a fine psychologist, with authority and dynamism.
The profile of M Amar as a mediator seems to be a one daring to suggest solutions if needed, even go as far as to make recommendations .
Because in some matters he is also skilled in the field of the mediation, he can lead the parties to reach a solution, helping them not only on the process but also on the object of the dispute.
The parties would recommend him whatever the result of the mediation. We can see that his special touch is also a kind of teaching mediation in the way that the persons understand the usefullness of the process and enjoy it.
Once again, no reportable negative comments have arisen.